#8986: Add support for convex rational polyhedral cones
----------------------------------+-----------------------------------------
   Reporter:  novoselt            |       Owner:  mhampton  
       Type:  enhancement         |      Status:  needs_work
   Priority:  major               |   Milestone:  sage-4.4.4
  Component:  geometry            |    Keywords:            
     Author:  Andrey Novoseltsev  |    Upstream:  N/A       
   Reviewer:  Volker Braun        |      Merged:            
Work_issues:                      |  
----------------------------------+-----------------------------------------

Comment(by novoselt):

 Well, I am still against exceptions, however I have just checked this:
 {{{
 sage: F5 = GF(5)
 sage: F7 = GF(7)
 sage: 2 == F5(2)
 True
 sage: 2 == F7(2)
 True
 sage: F5(2) == F7(2)
 False
 }}}
 So, since I like so much to invoke consistency reasons in my arguments, I
 retract my first reaction on 2) in your proposal. I think I will try to
 allow coercion of `ZZ^n` to any toric lattice of dimension `n`, but not
 backwards. Explicit casting from lattices to `ZZ^n` will be possible, but
 to go between two different toric lattices one will have to create a
 homomorphism or use double casting, i.e. I think that M(N(1,1)) should
 throw a `TypeError`. So the code from your comment will work like this:
 {{{
 sage: M = N.dual()
 sage: M(1,0,0) == N(1,0,0)   # this should raise an error - NO, RETURN
 FALSE
 False
 sage: (1,0,0) == N(1,0,0)    # should probably return true - YES
 False
 sage: M(1,0,0) == (1,0,0)    # should probably return true as well - YES
 False
 sage: (1,0,0) == (1,0,0)     # works as expected - YES
 True
 sage: (1,0,0) in octant.rays()  # this should return true - YES
 False
 sage: M(1,0,0) in octant.rays()  # this should definitely raise an error -
 NO, RETURN FALSE
 False
 }}}
 I think this way it's OK to be sloppy about lattices, especially if one
 just does not care about them. If one uses the very last command, then
 clearly (s)he is aware of toric lattices and should be able to interpret
 this `False` correctly.

-- 
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/8986#comment:10>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.

Reply via email to