#9356: make SAGE_ATLAS_LIB work on Solaris
-------------------------------+--------------------------------------------
 Reporter:  jhpalmieri         |         Owner:  drkirkby     
     Type:  defect             |        Status:  closed       
 Priority:  minor              |     Milestone:  sage-4.5.3   
Component:  solaris            |    Resolution:  fixed        
 Keywords:                     |        Author:  John Palmieri
 Upstream:  N/A                |      Reviewer:  David Kirkby 
   Merged:  sage-4.5.3.alpha0  |   Work_issues:               
-------------------------------+--------------------------------------------

Comment(by drkirkby):

 Replying to [comment:12 mpatel]:
 > Replying to [comment:11 drkirkby]:
 > > Could you try making that link symbolic link manually, and testing if
 that fixes the problem.
 >
 > I did this manually and reinstalled the !NumPy and !SciPy packages.  I'm
 not sure if it was necessary to recompile !NumPy, but your suggestion
 works for me.  The long doctests now all pass.

 I think it would have been to recompile, as this is a '''static'''
 library, which means it should get bound into the executable. Had it been
 a shared library missing, then just adding the link would have been
 sufficient, but I doubt it would with a static library.

 > John, have you had any problems with `SAGE_ATLAS_LIB`?

 I'm pretty sure John will do, as there's simply nothing in the code to
 make that static library available. John's fix was part of the solution,
 but not a complete solution. I'm sorry I did not make a better job of
 reviewing it, but it seemed so logical!

 Since I've already created a atlas-3.8.3.p14.spkg (#9508), which is merged
 into 4.5.3.alpha1, and #9508 includes this change, I think it is better to
 create another ticket to add the missing link, which I've since done. That
 is #9780.

 I'll implement that and test on !OpenSolaris later today. If it fixes it
 on !OpenSolaris then it will work for Solaris. The advantage of testing on
 !OpenSolaris is simply speed. It takes a lot less time to build Sage on a
 3.33 GHz Xeon than it does on {{{t2.math}}} or any SPARC I personally have
 access to.

 Dave

-- 
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/9356#comment:13>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.

Reply via email to