#9808: Upgrade numpy to 1.4.1 and scipy to 0.8
-----------------------------------+----------------------------------------
Reporter: maldun | Owner: maldun
Type: task | Status: needs_work
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-4.6
Component: packages | Keywords: numpy, scipy
Author: Stefan Reiterer | Upstream: N/A
Reviewer: Karl-Dieter Crisman | Merged:
Work_issues: |
-----------------------------------+----------------------------------------
Comment(by fbissey):
Replying to [comment:113 kcrisman]:
> Well, that seems to have helped...
> {{{
> gcc: scipy/special/c_misc/gammaincinv.c
> }}}
> and it keeps going!
>
> So it was the patches for G95 that were the problem. Which one in
particular (which command/line) caused the header confusion, do you think?
I'm just curious, and don't know enough about this to say.
>
Well, there are 4 patches that were applied in case g95 was found as the
fortran compiler. The faulty one is special.setup.py (or possibly
setup.py.special) which
replaces the file setup.py in the folder scipy/special.
This setup.py file has changed quite a lot between version 0.7.0 and
0.8.0.
The lines at fault:
{{{
# C libraries
config.add_library('sc_c_misc',sources=[join('c_misc','*.c')])
config.add_library('sc_cephes',sources=[join('cephes','*.c')],
include_dirs=[get_python_inc(),
get_numpy_include_dirs()],
macros=define_macros)
}}}
in version 0.7.0 and this is the code found in the "patch" file and
{{{
# C libraries
config.add_library('sc_c_misc',sources=[join('c_misc','*.c')],
include_dirs=[get_python_inc(),
get_numpy_include_dirs()],
macros=define_macros)
config.add_library('sc_cephes',sources=[join('cephes','*.c')],
include_dirs=[get_python_inc(),
get_numpy_include_dirs()],
macros=define_macros)
}}}
in version 0.8.0. This is a case were using patches rather copying files
wholesale would have prevented the problem. Either the patch wouldn't have
worked with the newer version and we would have known straight away or it
would have applied with some fuzz without dommaging this particular
section.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/9808#comment:118>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.
