#9876: Building PARI/GP with SAGE_CHECK=yes fails on 32-bit big endian machines
------------------------------+---------------------------------------------
Reporter: jdemeyer | Owner: tbd
Type: defect | Status: needs_review
Priority: blocker | Milestone: sage-4.6
Component: packages | Keywords:
Author: Jeroen Demeyer | Upstream: Completely fixed; Fix reported
upstream
Reviewer: | Merged:
Work_issues: |
------------------------------+---------------------------------------------
Comment(by jdemeyer):
Replying to [comment:25 jdemeyer]:
> I sent an email to the PARI people about this, let's see what they say.
I haven't had much luck, see [http://pari.math.u-bordeaux.fr/cgi-
bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1088]:
Bill Allombert wrote:
> Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
> > In that case, I strongly recommend you to apply the patch to ALL
darwin
> > architectures, not just ppc/ppc64.
> Why ? Is there any documentation that recommend that ? gcc documentation
certainly does not.
I do agree with leif though, I will prepare a .p7 with the fix.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/9876#comment:28>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.