#9876: Building PARI/GP with SAGE_CHECK=yes fails on 32-bit big endian machines
---------------------------------------------+------------------------------
Reporter: jdemeyer | Owner: tbd
Type: defect | Status: positive_review
Priority: blocker | Milestone: sage-4.6
Component: packages | Keywords:
Author: Jeroen Demeyer | Upstream: Completely fixed;
Fix reported upstream
Reviewer: John Palmieri, Leif Leonhardy | Merged:
Work_issues: |
---------------------------------------------+------------------------------
Changes (by leif):
* status: needs_review => positive_review
* reviewer: => John Palmieri, Leif Leonhardy
Comment:
I've again tested the latest p7 (which includes only minor* changes w.r.t.
the p6) and the new Sage library patch (additional regression doctest) on
Ubuntu 10.04 x86_64 ({{{ptestlong}}} run twice, the second time with #9898
applied and the lcalc p5 spkg from #9845). (Also, the new spkg is "sane".)
Since Jeroen has already successfully tested it on a PPC Mac (big-endian),
and John on t2.math (I assume in 32-bit big-endian mode), and the patch to
{{{get_dlcflags}}} has been reverted to what we already tested (which
definitely works on MacOS X 10.'''4''' '''Intel''', too), I set this to
"positive review".
----
*Although I must admit I haven't yet verified that the newly updated
upstream source files claiming to fix [http://pari.math.u-bordeaux.fr/cgi-
bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1079 PARI bug #1079] achieve the same as the
previously applied Sage patches ("segmentation fault in
{{{rnfequation(,,1)}}} over Q").
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/9876#comment:31>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.
