#9876: Building PARI/GP with SAGE_CHECK=yes fails on 32-bit big endian machines
------------------------------+---------------------------------------------
Reporter: jdemeyer | Owner: tbd
Type: defect | Status: needs_review
Priority: blocker | Milestone: sage-4.6
Component: packages | Keywords:
Author: Jeroen Demeyer | Upstream: Completely fixed; Fix reported
upstream
Reviewer: | Merged:
Work_issues: |
------------------------------+---------------------------------------------
Comment(by jdemeyer):
Replying to [comment:19 leif]:
> Jeroen, could you also extend the message printed when
{{{SAGE_TUNE_PARI=yes}}} to strongly recommend running PARI's test suite
after tuning?
>
> ----
>
> I'd prefer prepending {{{./}}} to {{{Configure}}}, since this will give
an ''appropriate'' error message in any case where {{{src/Configure}}}
does (for whatever reason) not exist.
Done. New spkg, same place:
[http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/jdemeyer/spkg/pari-2.4.3.svn-12577.p6.spkg]
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/9876#comment:22>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.
