#8431: Substitutions over unit cube faces (Rauzy fractals)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
   Reporter:  vdelecroix                                                        
|       Owner:  tjolivet                                                      
       Type:  task                                                              
|      Status:  needs_work                                                    
   Priority:  major                                                             
|   Milestone:  sage-4.6                                                      
  Component:  combinatorics                                                     
|    Keywords:  word morphism unit face generalized substitution rauzy fractal
     Author:  Vincent Delecroix, Timo Jolivet, Franco Saliola, Stepan Starosta  
|    Upstream:  N/A                                                           
   Reviewer:                                                                    
|      Merged:                                                                
Work_issues:                                                                    
|  
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------+

Comment(by tjolivet):

 Replying to [http://trac.sagemath.org/search/opensearch?q=comment%3A19
 abmasse]:


 > I agree with you that the `\newcommand`  makes the output much lighter.
 On the other hand, it doesn't compile  correctly... I tried it with a
 normal Latex distribution, but I had to  move the three `\newcommand`
 statements outside the tikzpicture environment. I might have a solution
 that would avoid using them, but which is not as neat. You could use !{{{
 \foreach \x / \y / \z / \c1 / \c2 / \c3 in {...} }}} and replace the `...`
 by the appropriate very long list of parameters for each face and then put
 in the body of the `\foreach` command the 3-lines Latex statement that
 draws the face with these parameters. What do you say? Do you understand
 what I'm talking about (I don't feel my explanation is very clear)?

 Yes, you made yourself  clear, and it seems like a  good idea. I'll try it
 on  big instances, and if it works, I'll make it that way in the new
 patch. Otherwise, moving the \newcommand outside the tikzpicture is not a
 problem at all (it should have been that way, I probably made a
 !``typo!''...).

-- 
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/8431#comment:20>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.

Reply via email to