#8431: Substitutions over unit cube faces (Rauzy fractals)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
Reporter: vdelecroix
| Owner: tjolivet
Type: task
| Status: needs_work
Priority: major
| Milestone: sage-4.6
Component: combinatorics
| Keywords: word morphism unit face generalized substitution rauzy fractal
Author: Vincent Delecroix, Timo Jolivet, Franco Saliola, Stepan Starosta
| Upstream: N/A
Reviewer:
| Merged:
Work_issues:
|
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
Comment(by abmasse):
Replying to [comment:20 tjolivet]:
> Replying to [http://trac.sagemath.org/search/opensearch?q=comment%3A19
abmasse]:
>
> Yes, you made yourself clear, and it seems like a good idea. I'll try
it on big instances, and if it works, I'll make it that way in the new
patch. Otherwise, moving the \newcommand outside the tikzpicture is not a
problem at all (it should have been that way, I probably made a
!``typo!''...).
The problem is that if you use the `tikz_plot` twice in the document with
`sagetex` there will be a compilation problem (since you can't use
`\newcommand` on an already define command (you need local variables!).
There might be another solution, using `\def\loza#1#2#3#4#5#6` (which is
local when included in a `tikzpicture` environment), but I haven't tried
it out.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/8431#comment:21>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.
