#9808: Upgrade numpy to 1.5.0 and scipy to 0.8
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
Reporter: maldun
| Owner: maldun
Type: task
| Status: needs_work
Priority: major
| Milestone: sage-4.6
Component: packages
| Keywords: numpy, scipy
Author: Stefan Reiterer, Francois Bissey, John Palmieri, David Kirkby
| Upstream: Fixed upstream, but not in a stable release.
Reviewer: Karl-Dieter Crisman, David Kirkby, Leif Leonhardy, Francois
Bissey | Merged:
Work_issues:
|
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
Changes (by drkirkby):
* upstream: Reported upstream. Developers acknowledge bug. => Fixed
upstream, but not in a stable release.
Old description:
> This ticket updates two packages, which must be updated together.
>
> The packages can be found found under:
>
> http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/palmieri/SPKG/numpy-1.5.0.spkg
>
> http://boxen.math.washington.edu/home/kirkby/patches/scipy-0.8.spkg
>
> '''Important notes:'''
> after installing Numpy, one needs to execute sage -ba, or else one will
> get runtime warnings.
>
> trac_9808_numpy_doctest_change.patch in the attachment has to be applied,
> in order to get all doctests running because some of the output has
> changed.
>
> '''For reviewers:'''
> changes.txt holds a summary of all changes with reference to the diffs,
> and links to other tickets
New description:
This ticket updates two packages, which must be updated together,
http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/palmieri/SPKG/numpy-1.5.0.spkg
http://boxen.math.washington.edu/home/kirkby/patches/scipy-0.8.spkg
However, these changes have made it necessary to update the scipy_sandbox
package too (#10092)
http://boxen.math.washington.edu/home/kirkby/patches/scipy_sandbox-20071020.p6.spkg
'''Important notes:'''
The above three packages need to be installed together.
After installing Numpy, one needs to execute sage -ba, or else one will
get runtime warnings. (Or if someone wants less hassle, they can patch
sage-4.6.alpha2.spkg before building Sage).
trac_9808_numpy_doctest_change.patch in the attachment has to be applied,
in order to get all doctests running because some of the output has
changed.
'''For reviewers:'''
changes.txt holds a summary of all changes with reference to the diffs,
and links to other tickets
--
Comment:
I run ptestlong after sorting out the Fortran issues, and get:
{{{
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The following tests failed:
sage -t -long
devel/sage/sage/rings/polynomial/polynomial_element.pyx # 1 doctests
failed
sage -t -long devel/sage/sage/tensor/differential_forms.py # 1
doctests failed
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Total time for all tests: 1868.7 seconds
}}}
which is two failures I was aware of, which are being worked on at #10041
and #10042.
However, to have only these 2 failures, and not 5, it's essential to use
an updated package at #10092, which just adds exports FC, F77, F90 and F95
from scipy_sandbox.
Of course, that still does not resolve the OS X issues which John has. If
they are new to these updated packages, then we still have a problem.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/9808#comment:228>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.
