#9808: Upgrade numpy to 1.5.0 and scipy to 0.8
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
Reporter: maldun
| Owner: maldun
Type: task
| Status: needs_work
Priority: major
| Milestone: sage-4.6
Component: packages
| Keywords: numpy, scipy
Author: Stefan Reiterer, Francois Bissey, John Palmieri, David Kirkby
| Upstream: Reported upstream. Developers acknowledge bug.
Reviewer: Karl-Dieter Crisman, David Kirkby, Leif Leonhardy, Francois
Bissey | Merged:
Work_issues:
|
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
Comment(by drkirkby):
Replying to [comment:217 jhpalmieri]:
> Dave: Is this the sort of change you had in mind?
Yes. I personally only ever use () and not {} in scripts, but I assume the
latter is ok.
That '''probably''' means that !SciPy and scipy_sandbox do not need
similar - I suspect they pick these up from Numpy. But we will see. It
might be necessary to add it to scipy_sandbox too.
Dave
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/9808#comment:218>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.
