#10042: Doctest failure in sage/rings/polynomial/polynomial_element.pyx
------------------------------+---------------------------------------------
Reporter: mpatel | Owner: mvngu
Type: defect | Status: positive_review
Priority: blocker | Milestone: sage-4.6
Component: doctest | Keywords:
Author: Dima Pasechnik | Upstream: N/A
Reviewer: Leif Leonhardy | Merged:
Work_issues: |
------------------------------+---------------------------------------------
Comment(by dimpase):
Replying to [comment:81 zimmerma]:
> Replying to [comment:80 zimmerma]:
> > I've reported to Kaveh Ghazi (a GCC developer) the strange behaviour
of comment 78. If/when I get
> > an answer, I will report it here.
>
> cf http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46080 to follow the GCC
issue. However I'm not sure
> this is related to this ticket. Does Lapack use single precision (i.e.,
the C float type)?
>
Lapack has routines for both single and double precision (names starting
with S and D, respectively)
Dmitrii
> Paul
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/10042#comment:82>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.
