#9138: Categories for all rings
--------------------------------------------+-------------------------------
Reporter: jbandlow | Owner: nthiery
Type: defect | Status: needs_work
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-4.7
Component: categories | Keywords: introspection,
categories for rings
Author: Simon King | Upstream: N/A
Reviewer: | Merged:
Work_issues: Categories for more rings... |
--------------------------------------------+-------------------------------
Changes (by SimonKing):
* status: needs_review => needs_work
* work_issues: => Categories for more rings...
Comment:
While working on #11115, I found that there are still some rings that do
neither use the new coercion framework nor properly initialize their
category. That includes quotient rings and free algebras. The problem is
that, even though they inherit from sage.rings.ring.Ring, they do not call
the appropriate `__init__`.
I was wondering whether that should be done here or on #11115, but after
all I think it should better be here.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/9138#comment:42>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.
