#9138: Categories for all rings
--------------------------------------------+-------------------------------
Reporter: jbandlow | Owner: nthiery
Type: defect | Status: needs_work
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-4.7
Component: categories | Keywords: introspection,
categories for rings
Author: Simon King | Upstream: N/A
Reviewer: | Merged:
Work_issues: Categories for more rings... |
--------------------------------------------+-------------------------------
Comment(by SimonKing):
It is rather frustrating. I try to fit `BooleanPolynomialRing` into the
new coercion model, defining _element_constructor_ and _coerce_map_from_
-- and now, suddenly Sage is complaining that it is still using the old
coercion model! I found that the reason for the complaint is the existence
of _element_constructor. But that should be the ''new'' model, shouldn't
it??
Time to call it a day...
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/9138#comment:44>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.
