#5847: Update GMP-ECM to 6.3
------------------------------------------------------------+---------------
Reporter: mabshoff | Owner:
leif
Type: enhancement | Status:
needs_review
Priority: major | Milestone:
sage-4.7
Component: packages | Resolution:
Keywords: MPIR elliptic curves libecm ecm spkg | Work_issues:
Upstream: N/A | Reviewer:
Leif Leonhardy, Dima Pasechnik
Author: Mike Hansen, Leif Leonhardy, Jeroen Demeyer | Merged:
Dependencies: |
------------------------------------------------------------+---------------
Changes (by mariah):
* status: needs_info => needs_review
Comment:
Replying to [comment:96 leif]:
> Replying to [comment:94 mariah]:
> > SAGE_FAT_BINARY needs to be supported.
> [[BR]]
>
> In which way / to what extent?
>
> (See my previous post.)
If I build a SAGE_FAT_BINARY version of sage on one of the skynet x86_64
machines, then move that build to another skynet x86_64 machine, then all
the tests should pass. That is my understanding of what SAGE_FAT_BINARY
should accomplish.
In spite of ecm not explicitly recognizing SAGE_FAT_BINARY, when
I have built SAGE_FAT_BINARY versions of previous versions of sage (for
example 4.6.2), I have not run into any problems. (Perhaps
I have just been lucky.)
Does this spkg maintain this SAGE_FAT_BINARY functionality?
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/5847#comment:97>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.
