#11246: flint-1.5.0.p5's extraneous #includes break typedef ulong in sys/types.h
---------------------------------------------------+------------------------
   Reporter:  dimpase                              |          Owner:  tbd       
                    
       Type:  defect                               |         Status:  
positive_review               
   Priority:  major                                |      Milestone:  
sage-4.7.2                    
  Component:  packages                             |       Keywords:  cygwin    
                    
Work_issues:                                       |       Upstream:  N/A       
                    
   Reviewer:  Karl-Dieter Crisman, Leif Leonhardy  |         Author:  Dima 
Pasechnik, Jeroen Demeyer
     Merged:                                       |   Dependencies:            
                    
---------------------------------------------------+------------------------

Comment(by dimpase):

 Replying to [comment:63 leif]:
 > Replying to [comment:49 dimpase]:
 > > IMHO, this discussion just highlights a need to revamp the whole spkg
 system, for 99% of the standard spkgs, at least.
 > > It would be much better if the whole non-building part of the spkg
 install is done in a uniform way, by hg, say,
 > > rather than handwritten scripts...
 > >
 > > The need for the current spkg system is dictated by the need of some
 optional parts of Sage, that demand, say, a distribution in an unmodified
 form. Yet, putting the spkg source under hg is not a modification. Sage
 can distribute spkg source with the hg tree, and Sage-needed patches as
 patches to be applied by an spkg-install.
 >
 > If I understand you correctly (having the whole upstream tree under
 revision control), that would heavily increase their sizes.
 >

 Really? Why? If I look at my current $SAGEROOT/devel/sage/, I have 878Mb,
 while its .hg is 51Mb. And here the fact that this tree has a long history
 must be taken into account. A typical spkg tree would be started from a
 clean history, and keep it for most of the files. So it would be a pretty
 small increase.

-- 
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/11246#comment:64>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.

Reply via email to