#11021: clean up sage-spkg
--------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
   Reporter:  jhpalmieri              |          Owner:  tbd                    
       Type:  defect                  |         Status:  needs_work             
   Priority:  minor                   |      Milestone:  sage-4.7.1             
  Component:  packages                |       Keywords:  SPKG.txt SAGE.txt -info
Work_issues:  Rebase to 4.7.1.alpha4  |       Upstream:  N/A                    
   Reviewer:  Kelvin Li               |         Author:  Leif Leonhardy         
     Merged:                          |   Dependencies:                         
--------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Changes (by leif):

  * status:  needs_review => needs_work
  * work_issues:  => Rebase to 4.7.1.alpha4


Comment:

 Hmmm, for Sage 4.7.1.alpha4, we'll have to rebase the patch:
 {{{
 applying /home/leif/Sage/patches/trac_11021-sage-spkg-cleanup-v2.patch
 patching file sage-spkg
 Hunk #3 succeeded at 59 (offset 4 lines).
 Hunk #4 succeeded at 93 (offset 4 lines).
 Hunk #5 succeeded at 139 (offset 4 lines).
 Hunk #6 succeeded at 164 (offset 4 lines).
 Hunk #7 succeeded at 183 (offset 4 lines).
 Hunk #8 succeeded at 191 (offset 4 lines).
 Hunk #9 succeeded at 226 (offset 4 lines).
 Hunk #10 succeeded at 250 (offset 4 lines).
 Hunk #11 succeeded at 273 (offset 4 lines).
 Hunk #12 succeeded at 292 (offset 4 lines).
 Hunk #13 FAILED at 304
 Hunk #14 succeeded at 402 (offset 4 lines).
 Hunk #15 succeeded at 413 (offset 4 lines).
 Hunk #16 succeeded at 439 (offset 4 lines).
 1 out of 16 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file sage-spkg.rej
 abort: patch failed to apply
 }}}

 Sorry for the delay btw, been busy with other things.

 Though there are still some things that could be improved (e.g. still two
 instances of `build` rather than `$BUILD` IIRC), and I would have put the
 `>&2` right after `echo` to be more obvious, I'm ok with your changes.

 I.e., I'll rebase the patch as is, test it, and if ''you're'' ok with
 ''my'' previous changes, we'd have a positive review.

 (Other things like supporting `SAGE_CHECK=ignore` and what else we've
 mentioned on this ticket can be implemented on follow-ups, we just have to
 get this ticket merged first... :) )

-- 
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/11021#comment:14>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.

Reply via email to