#9138: Categories for all rings
---------------------------------------------------------------------+------
Reporter: jbandlow |
Owner: nthiery
Type: defect |
Status: needs_review
Priority: major |
Milestone: sage-4.7.2
Component: categories |
Keywords: introspection, categories for rings
Work_issues: comparison of BooleanPolynomialRings; one doctest fix |
Upstream: N/A
Reviewer: |
Author: Simon King
Merged: |
Dependencies: sage-4.7, #11268, #11139, #9976, #9944, #11269, #11316, #11342
---------------------------------------------------------------------+------
Changes (by SimonKing):
* status: needs_work => needs_review
Comment:
I have updated the second patch. Since the ticket now depends on #11342, I
added a fix for pari ring doctest. Also, I completely removed the
`__richcmp__` and `_cmp_` code from the boolean polynomial rings, since
the code is actually not needed anymore (they are unique parents, and thus
`R==S` is the same as `R is S`.
For me, the long tests pass. I hope they do for you as well?
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/9138#comment:101>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.
