#9138: Categories for all rings
--------------------------+-------------------------------------------------
Reporter: jbandlow | Owner: nthiery
Type: defect | Status: needs_review
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-4.7.2
Component: categories | Keywords: introspection, categories for
rings
Work_issues: | Upstream: N/A
Reviewer: | Author: Simon King
Merged: | Dependencies: sage-4.7, #11268, #11139, #9976,
#9944, #11269, #11316
--------------------------+-------------------------------------------------
Changes (by SimonKing):
* status: needs_work => needs_review
* work_issues: fix doctests errors in pbory =>
Comment:
I got it!!
The problem was a misprint. I use the letter j where it should be the
number zero. Apparently, on my machine, j became initialised as zero, so,
things worked. But (as I found by printing its value) on sage.math it
became initialised as one, hence, resulting in an index error.
I updated the patch, and with it, I find
{{{
SimonKing@sage:~/SAGE/sage-4.7.2.alpha2-sage.math.washington.edu-x86_64-Linux$
./sage -t devel/sage/sage/rings/polynomial/pbori.pyx
sage -t "devel/sage/sage/rings/polynomial/pbori.pyx"
[6.0 s]
----------------------------------------------------------------------
All tests passed!
Total time for all tests: 6.0 seconds
}}}
So, that was easy... Back to "needs review"!
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/9138#comment:95>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.
