#11521: Memleak when resolving the action of Integers on an Elliptic Curve
------------------------+---------------------------------------------------
Reporter: jpflori | Owner: robertwb
Type: defect | Status: needs_work
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-4.8
Component: coercion | Keywords: sd35
Work_issues: | Upstream: N/A
Reviewer: | Author: Simon King
Merged: | Dependencies: #11900
------------------------+---------------------------------------------------
Changes (by SimonKing):
* status: needs_review => needs_work
Comment:
I think I need help with debugging.
When I have sage-4.8.alpha3 with #9138, #11900, #715 and #11115, then all
doctests pass.
When I also have #11521, then the test
sage/rings/number_field/number_field_rel.py segfaults. When I run the
tests in verbose mode, then all tests seem to pass, but in the very end it
says
{{{
4 items had no tests:
__main__
__main__.change_warning_output
__main__.check_with_tolerance
__main__.warning_function
69 items passed all tests:
...
660 tests in 73 items.
660 passed and 0 failed.
Test passed.
The doctested process was killed by signal 11
[15.0 s]
}}}
So, could it be that not one of the tests was killed, but the test
''process'' itself?
What is even more confusing: When I run the tests with the option
-randorder, then most of the time the tests pass without a problem.
Can you give me any pointer on how those things could possibly be
debugged?
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/11521#comment:48>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.
