#10682: sum fails with lower bound != 0 or 1 (upgrade maxima to 5.26)
---------------------------------------------------------+------------------
   Reporter:  fmaltey                                    |          Owner:  
burcin                    
       Type:  defect                                     |         Status:  
needs_info                
   Priority:  critical                                   |      Milestone:  
sage-5.0                  
  Component:  symbolics                                  |       Keywords:  
maxima 5.26.0 binomial sum
Work_issues:  domain issue, error handling in nintegral  |       Upstream:  N/A 
                      
   Reviewer:  Jean-Pierre Flori,                         |         Author:  
Dima Pasechnik            
     Merged:                                             |   Dependencies:      
                      
---------------------------------------------------------+------------------

Comment(by jpflori):

 Im currently looking at Maxima's code and am not yet convinced of what
 changed in the last version.

 There' indeed the possibility that an error get raised by Maxima (handler
 ... error stuff) if some values cannot be converted to floats float-or-
 lose stuff).

 In this case Maxima returns the partially evaluated expression.

 But that does not explain why Maxima now returns (0,0,0,6) rather than the
 old unevaluated expression for integrating x with a crazy expression. I'm
 currently looking at dqags.lisp but did not find anything meaningful yet.

 In particular, it also makes me wonder whether the message of the Sage
 error (for the "workaround", but also for the earlier try/catch stuff) is
 meaningful.

 Will it ever be related to precision problems ? because Maxima seems not
 to complain any more.

 and as I said earlier, returning Error ourselves when when detect that the
 last value of the tuple and as Nils proposes to do, seems a good idea to
 me, but should be done later. I'd just like to actually reflect what
 Maxima tells at the Sage level even though the end user still has to check
 this last value for a moment.

-- 
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/10682#comment:64>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.

Reply via email to