#10682: sum fails with lower bound != 0 or 1 (upgrade maxima to 5.26)
---------------------------------------------------------+------------------
Reporter: fmaltey | Owner:
burcin
Type: defect | Status:
needs_info
Priority: critical | Milestone:
sage-5.0
Component: symbolics | Keywords:
maxima 5.26.0 binomial sum
Work_issues: domain issue, error handling in nintegral | Upstream: N/A
Reviewer: Jean-Pierre Flori, | Author:
Dima Pasechnik
Merged: | Dependencies:
---------------------------------------------------------+------------------
Comment(by dimpase):
Replying to [comment:55 jpflori]:
[...]
> Setting the domain can be domain with a simple call to
set('domain','xxx') as mentioned above.
>
> But I just discovered that we (I?) messed up something when building the
library interface.
>
> With the pexpect interface (be sure to actually start it with
maxima.start()), one can use maxima.domain directly. This does not work
with the library interface.
>
> Of course we can also add a new method on top of that as well.
OK, I am confused now - can we have a new public method to do the
simplification domain switching in the library, i.e.
the equivalent of {{{sage.calculus.calculus.maxima('domain:real')}}},
etc., or it would not work due to a bug in the library interface? If the
latter, it looks like one can give it the positive review now, right?
I am relieved to hear that there are "real" regressions --- bedankt, Nils!
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/10682#comment:57>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.
