#10682: sum fails with lower bound != 0 or 1 (upgrade maxima to 5.26)
---------------------------------------------------------+------------------
Reporter: fmaltey | Owner:
burcin
Type: defect | Status:
needs_info
Priority: critical | Milestone:
sage-5.0
Component: symbolics | Keywords:
maxima 5.26.0 binomial sum
Work_issues: domain issue, error handling in nintegral | Upstream: N/A
Reviewer: Jean-Pierre Flori, | Author:
Dima Pasechnik
Merged: | Dependencies:
---------------------------------------------------------+------------------
Comment(by jpflori):
Thanx a lot for locating this! It would have taken me ages to do so. But
you did not quite answered one of my questions: we won't get the last
error because of precision stuff, so this can get removed? My point is
that those last lines were explicitely made to catch that specific error
that is not reported as such anymore, so I think it's useless, or if it
can then it won't be becase of precision provlems anymore so the stuff
about precision should be removed (and the reference to the maxima mailing
list should be removed as well).
I also agree it's not really important from a usefulness point of view,
but having a good understanding of what we use in Sage is and our code
should reflect that.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/10682#comment:66>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.
