#12969: Coercion failures in symmetric functions
-------------------------------------------------+--------------------------
       Reporter:  aschilling                     |         Owner:  sage-combinat
           Type:  defect                         |        Status:  new          
       Priority:  major                          |     Milestone:  sage-5.3     
      Component:  combinatorics                  |    Resolution:               
       Keywords:  symmetric functions, coercion  |   Work issues:               
Report Upstream:  N/A                            |     Reviewers:               
        Authors:                                 |     Merged in:               
   Dependencies:                                 |      Stopgaps:               
-------------------------------------------------+--------------------------

Comment (by SimonKing):

 Replying to [comment:16 nthiery]:
 > Yes that's the well know issue (#8878) of the current coercion model
 implementation: it does a depth first search rather than a breath first.

 OK. I think #8878 would involve a considerable amount of work. So, for
 simplicity, I suggest to fix the cache bug in the current implementation
 of depth first search ''here''. And if in future someone will tackle
 #8878, he/she should do so on top of that fix.

-- 
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/12969#comment:21>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.

Reply via email to