#12969: Coercion failures in symmetric functions
-------------------------------------------------+--------------------------
Reporter: aschilling | Owner: sage-combinat
Type: defect | Status: new
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-5.3
Component: combinatorics | Resolution:
Keywords: symmetric functions, coercion | Work issues:
Report Upstream: N/A | Reviewers:
Authors: | Merged in:
Dependencies: | Stopgaps:
-------------------------------------------------+--------------------------
Comment (by nthiery):
Replying to [comment:21 SimonKing]:
> OK. I think #8878 would involve a considerable amount of work. So, for
simplicity, I suggest to fix the cache bug in the current implementation
of depth first search ''here''. And if in future someone will tackle
#8878, he/she should do so on top of that fix.
I actually have an implementation for #8878 in the queue I had written two
years ago; however it's disabled because there remained quite some work
cleaning up Sage here and there for things to work smoothly.
So, yes, if you have a quick fix to the depth first search, please go
ahead; my patch certainly needs a lot of rebasing anyway.
Cheers,
Nicolas
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/12969#comment:22>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.
