I have seen this issue a few times with older sambar release.. the problem turned out 
to be a corrupted / messed up mailbox.. It was really hard to track down because there 
was only 1-2 messages buried in the logs that reflected the mailbox was screwed up 
when trying to write to it.. The result of this hosed box was the the pop3-client 
would not disconnect and would retry based on the clients settings.. After a period of 
time the client would end up chewing up all of the threads.. Im sure a proper cleanup 
of the threads would be the desired fix but in my case I just deleted and re-created 
the mailbox and the thread problem went away.. 

Danny


On 19/Jun/2004 04:44:08, Peter wrote:
> Your problem sounds more like you have a messed up email client or a email
> that is corrupt. Either could cause Sambar to not release the threads.
> Have you tried running sambar as a service and using NTview to monitor the
> logs? You might find it more solid. I'm runing the previews on a very busy
> production box and the only time I restart is when I do an update.
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: "Jim Hall" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "sambar List Member"  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2004 18:52:47 -0500
> Subject: [sambar] Mail server woes
> 
> > This issue still exists in sambar 6. For the 5th or 6th day in row I
> > have
> > had to leave the office to restart sambar because server threads are at
> > 299,
> > and network connections the same. At this point this bug is costing me
> > money
> > in lost time.
> > 
> > While increasing the MTAs is a nice suggestion, it is NOT a solution.
> > My MTA
> > settings are at 15.
> > 
> > At this point, I need to know if Tod is addressing this issues, if so,
> > what
> > is the timeframe for a real solution. And if not, can I get a refund
> > for the
> > $100 I paid for software that works WORSE than the previous versions.
> > 
> > This is unacceptable for production grade server software.
> > 
> > ----- Original Message ----- 
> > From: "Peter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: "sambar List Member" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 2004 12:12 PM
> > Subject: [sambar] Mail server woes
> > 
> > 
> > > Paul
> > > The default was 1 just like many of the other defaults you must
> > change
> > > them to use the server in real life.
> > >
> > > When you run sambar as a service yes use the watcher and also use the
> > > service manager just in case. If you want the GUI in the try then run
> > > NTview.exe out of the bin, its a service GUI. The only draw back is
> > it
> > > does not have pause and it must be started after the service.
> > >
> > > Peter
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: "Paul Alger \(Ironclad\)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > To: "sambar List Member"  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2004 08:54:23 -0800
> > > Subject: [sambar] Mail server woes
> > >
> > > > Sambar defaults to mta = 1.  If that is low, perhaps Todd should
> > change
> > > > the
> > > > default?
> > > >
> > > > Peter, are you talking about the "Watcher Daemon"? Or running
> > Sambar as
> > > > a
> > > > service? It seems like the watcher daemon doesn't check for a mail
> > > > server
> > > > failure.  I am not running Sambar as a service but I can certainly
> > give
> > > > that
> > > > a try and set the service manager to restart on failure.
> > > >
> > > > It says it is ok in the docs but is it advisable to run the watcher
> > > > daemon
> > > > when running Sambar as a service?  In general, is it better to run
> > > > Sambar as
> > > > a service?  For me, there is just something comforting in seeing
> > the
> > > > icon in
> > > > the task bar tray...
> > > >
> > > > Paul
> > > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> > > > Behalf Of
> > > > Peter
> > > > Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 2004 8:36 AM
> > > > To: sambar List Member
> > > > Subject: [sambar] Mail server woes
> > > >
> > > > Guys MTA's set to 1 or 2 is very low try increasing to 10 to 15,
> > next
> > > > set
> > > > your service manager recovery to restart on failure and then there
> > is
> > > > no
> > > > need to worry.
> > > >
> > > > Peter
> > > >
> > > > Jim it sopunds to me like the key you have is wrong or bad, get
> > James
> > > > or Tod
> > > > to give you a new one.
> > > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: "Jim H." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > To: "sambar List Member"  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2004 10:27:33 -0600
> > > > Subject: [sambar] Mail server woes
> > > >
> > > > > I am seeing the same thing, but I also saw it in 5.3.
> > > > >
> > > > > Eventually the connections just keep growing, as if Sambar isn't
> > > > > killing idol connections. I recently increased MTAs [from 1 to 2]
> > and
> > > > > am watching closely to see if that helps this issue.
> > > > >
> > > > > Between this problem and my restart/registration problem I damn
> > near
> > > > > have to have someone babysitting the server 24/7. Gets expensive
> > > > fast.
> > > > >
> > > > > Not sure how much longer I can do this...
> > > > >
> > > > > -jim
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On 11/Feb/2004 08:14:11, Paul Alger \(Ironclad\) wrote:
> > > > > > I am experiencing random mail server crashes on Sambar 6.  It
> > > > > > happens
> > > > > on the
> > > > > > average of once a week or so.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The problem seems to be linked to this server log entry:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > [2004-02-11 07:56:54] WARN:  POP3D event
> > 'samples.dll:mail_connect'
> > > > > failed
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Or this one:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > [2004-02-11 07:44:02] ERROR: File openc of
> > > > > 'D:/sambar/config/mail.ini'
> > > > > > failed.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > After I reboot the server, things start working fine for
> > another
> > > > > > week
> > > > > or
> > > > > > so..
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > What happens is, the server will not accept any pop3
> > connections.
> > > > > They just
> > > > > > eventually time out.  Sometimes the SMTP server just keeps
> > working
> > > > > fine,
> > > > > > other times it crashes as well.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > As of now, I can't trust the server to run without babysitting
> > it
> > > > > > all
> > > > > the
> > > > > > time.  I am seriously considering rolling back to Sambar 5.x. 
> > It
> > > > > seems to
> > > > > > be much more stable than Sambar 6.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Is anyone else experiencing these problems?  Does anyone know
> > what
> > > > > > "samples.dll" does?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Paul Alger
> > > > > >
> > > > > > ---
> > > > > > Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
> > > > > > Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
> > > > > > Version: 6.0.583 / Virus Database: 369 - Release Date:
> > 2/10/2004
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > -------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > > To unsubscribe please go to http://www.sambar.ch/list/
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > -------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > To unsubscribe please go to http://www.sambar.ch/list/
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > -------------------------------------------------------
> > > > To unsubscribe please go to http://www.sambar.ch/list/
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > ---
> > > > Incoming mail is certified Virus Free.
> > > > Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
> > > > Version: 6.0.583 / Virus Database: 369 - Release Date: 2/10/2004
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > ---
> > > > Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
> > > > Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
> > > > Version: 6.0.583 / Virus Database: 369 - Release Date: 2/10/2004
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > -------------------------------------------------------
> > > > To unsubscribe please go to http://www.sambar.ch/list/
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > > -------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe please go to http://www.sambar.ch/list/
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > -------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe please go to http://www.sambar.ch/list/
> > 
> > 
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe please go to http://www.sambar.ch/list/
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 






-------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe please go to http://www.sambar.ch/list/



Reply via email to