On May 31, 2003 18:35, Zak Greant wrote: ... > > We listen ... oops ... read your words with very much interest, and you > > said that SAPDB would be added to the list of supported storage engines, > > which would mean that very many features are thrown away. ...
Aha! I was just chatting on with a few of the developers who said, "Zak, it won't be a storage engine. It will be *interoperable*. Now go take a bullet for the team and explain that you were wrong." :) So... What will be the technical implementation of interoperable? That I do not know yet, however it should not mean storage engine! :) Cheers! --zak _______________________________________________ sapdb.general mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://listserv.sap.com/mailman/listinfo/sapdb.general
