I also remember some issues with the forms package, but that could have been because AppEngine was using a version of Django pre- newforms. They still use Django 0.96.1. IMHO, this is all moot until they upgrade to 1.1 though.
Griffin Caprio - Founder & President, 1530 Technologies, Inc. [email protected] On Aug 26, 2009, at 9:30 AM, Hazzadous wrote: > > The main issue is the difference in the interfaces of the database > models. I suppose another issue may be that certain queries in > satchmo may well not have a mapping to a query in datastore language. > > When then also have the task of checking dependencies are compatible > with appengine, and porting them when not. > > I consider it to be well worth the hassle though. Have Google deal > with server maintenance, application execution, versioning, developer > access etc. is a huge benefit leaving me to concentrate on my app. > logic. > > I envisage it would also open up Satchmo to a couple more target > audiences also; being able to simply update to appengine a sample > satchmo project akin to app-engine-patch would mean it would not be > out of the question for someone who is primarily user interface to > upload the sample to appengine, make whatever changes to templates and > have a shop front up and running without any thought given to the host > it is running on. Further, hosting a blogger.com style satchmo > service on appengine (login with Google Account, create shop, > associate shop with Google Apps Domain, fill out products, choose from > a default style, or pay to have a custom design). > > There's still plenty of meat on that bone. Throw it in appengine with > some ads …baby, you’ve got a stew goin'! > > Harry > > On Aug 26, 12:07 am, Griffin Caprio <[email protected]> > wrote: >> I would be interested in helping to take a look at that. From the >> little I used of App Engine, it's non-trivial to get a Django app up >> and running on it, let alone something like Satchmo. However, given >> the memory / processing needs of Satchmo, it seems like a natural >> evolution for deployment. >> >> On Aug 25, 2009, at 5:02 PM, Hazzadous wrote: >> >> >> >>> Are we talking project as in a shop, or a satchmo app. Personally >>> at >>> the top of my list is Satchmo on AppEngine. Is this something you >>> would be interested in working on? >> >>> On Aug 24, 5:28 pm, Hazzadous <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> Anything your thinking or in particular? >> >>>> On Aug 24, 5:12 pm, Anthony Cintron <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >> >>>>> Any Satchmo Devs looking for a project to work on? If you're free >>>>> and >>>>> interested please contact me. >> >>>>> thanks, >> >>>>> Anthony Cintron >>>>> Application Developer >>>>> Call: +1 718 925 3915 >>>>> E-mail: [email protected] >>>>> Web site: sweetiesandgangsters.net/promo >>>>> Blog: codegasm.blogspot.com >> >> > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Satchmo users" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/satchmo-users?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
