Follow-up Comment #5, task #8917 (project administration):
Yes, I think you guys are right about the Modified BSD license. I
misinterpreted what they meant by removal of the advertising clause.
I did find such a 4-clause license in lumps/genmidi/oplvar.h
If the Modified BSD licensed projects files like the scripts do not need a
copyright notice and the license notice included, I guess it would be alright.
I am on the assumption of the contrary; the copyright and license notice rule
still applies with a Modified BSD license.
The only file that has the full license notice and the copyright notice
pertaining to the project itself was in
lumps/genmidi/genmidi-gen.c
There is also some files from the PlayPal? project that claims GPL and its
folder has an older version of the GPL. That's fine I guess.
I am not sure why Simon Howard placed a comment "Consider this GPL'd".
Probably a joke. wadinfo-builder.pl
They have a CREDITS file which lists the contributors and a general thing
that they have done. There are also status files but those seem to be mostly
for their goals and not dating a copyright.
I believe all the other things are okay. Free Software ethic instead of Open
Source. There is a mention of linux instead of GNU/Linux in
./levels/oblivion/map31.txt . I believe he is correct about the dependencies,
I took a look at the webpage but did not d/l the their licenses. I don't know
what a Pbmplus license is.
_______________________________________________________
Reply to this item at:
<http://savannah.gnu.org/task/?8917>
_______________________________________________
Message sent via/by Savannah
http://savannah.gnu.org/
