Follow-up Comment #30, task #14945 (project administration):
> This topic is somewhat meaningless
Then I'm skipping it to save the time.
> 1) The EROFS file system can be licensed as "License: GNU General Public
License v2 or later", not GPL-v2 only;
I disagree, in the context that the user would have to follow GPLv2-only
terms.
> 2) Considering effectively, there are projects (the whole or parts of these
projects) are GPL-v2 only effectively.
This wasn't backed by facts, and even if true, I don't consider it really
relevant: having exceptions doesn't invalidate the rule.
> If there exist some problems, please point out.
I feel we are miscommunicating.
_______________________________________________________
Reply to this item at:
<http://savannah.gnu.org/task/?14945>
_______________________________________________
Message sent via Savannah
https://savannah.gnu.org/
