Follow-up Comment #31, task #14945 (project administration): >> 1) The EROFS file system can be licensed as "License: GNU General Public License v2 or later", not GPL-v2 only;
>I disagree, in the context that the user would have to follow GPLv2-only terms. Please refer to: https://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.html#AllCompatibility https://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.html#compat-matrix-footnote-2 It clear say that While _you may release your project (either your original work and/or work that you received and modified) under GPLv2-or-later in this case_, note that the other code you're using must remain under GPLv2 only. As long as your project depends on that code, you won't be able to upgrade the license of your project to GPLv3-or-later, and the work as a whole (any combination of both your project and the other code) can only be conveyed under the terms of GPLv2. Thanks, Gao Xiang _______________________________________________________ Reply to this item at: <http://savannah.gnu.org/task/?14945> _______________________________________________ Message sent via Savannah https://savannah.gnu.org/
