Follow-up Comment #33, task #14945 (project administration): >This wasn't backed by facts, and even if true, I don't consider it really relevant: having exceptions doesn't invalidate the rule.
And I might repeat again, the Savannah web pages currently don't express "Savannah requires GPLv3+ compatibility" directly, on: http://savannah.gnu.org/maintenance/HowToGetYourProjectApprovedQuickly/ or https://savannah.gnu.org/register/requirements.php So I think if "Savannah requires GPLv3+ compatibility", it needs to be shown explicitly, and I think there are no exception for these projects. Currently, it just make a "For manuals" example and use the "recommend" expression, "For _manuals_, we _recommend_ GNU FDL version X-or-later, where X is the latest released version of the FDL; other licensing compatible with that is acceptable." Actually, I have no idea of the _historical exceptions_ expression, "Savannah requires GPLv3+ compatibility" is not pointed out explicitly yet, the "history" I think is now. Thank, Gao Xiang _______________________________________________________ Reply to this item at: <http://savannah.gnu.org/task/?14945> _______________________________________________ Message sent via Savannah https://savannah.gnu.org/
