> Isn't the whole basis of Spark a matter of adding proof 
> statements in the comments ?  I don't think the general 
> compiler marketplace would go for that built-in to compilers. 
>  After all:
>       1. The Praxis implementation can be used with multiple compilers
>       2. The compiler market is so immature that some people are still
>          using C, C++ and Java.
> But for the high-integrity market, Spark seems to fit the bill.
> --
> Larry Kilgallen

We think so!  However, like everything else, it is how you use things
that matter most.  What SPARK allows is very effective secure coding
(what this list is all about).  There is an entry on this subject on the
Build Security In website:



Secure Coding mailing list (SC-L) SC-L@securecoding.org
List information, subscriptions, etc - http://krvw.com/mailman/listinfo/sc-l
List charter available at - http://www.securecoding.org/list/charter.php
SC-L is hosted and moderated by KRvW Associates, LLC (http://www.KRvW.com)
as a free, non-commercial service to the software security community.

Reply via email to