I grabbed this from SVN and compiled it. I tried annotating with with
both Stockfish an Crafty.

Stockfish UCI
-------------
Annotation appears to function as designed when "Annotate all moves" is
enabled.

Crafty 23.1
-----------
About every other time I start a Crafty analysis, the annotation text
doesn't show the score, instead it just shows an Mx value (e.g. M1,
M6, ...etc). However it does this in non-mating positions. For example,
it indicates all moved it's suggesting are "M1" moves. Here is an
example:

1.e4=
        Crafty v23.1:14:M1

        (14:M1 1.Nf3 Nc6 2.Nc3 Nf6 3.e4 e5 4.Bb5 Bb4)

So this is obviously not a mate situation. Once it starts doing this, if
I exit SCID and restart it, the issue is usually resolved, but sometimes
I have to exit and restart a couple of times.

Another strange behavior is that sometimes it's suggesting moves that
actually have a score *lower* that it's analysis of the move that was
actually mode. For example it suggests a line that is +3.2 when it's
evaluation of the actual move that was made is +3.6.

Overall
-------
In general because the tweaking of the 327 score is so small I'm forced
to annotate all moves in order to see the improved mate lines (I think
it's set to a one "centi-pawn" penalty for each additional move when
comparing mates?).

At my level, I'm really only interested in 1+/- (or greater) score
changes. What I was hoping for was to annotate a game and have all moves
that are +/- 1 annotated, but then also all "better" mate lines (such as
a mate in 3 opportunity, when my move was a mate in 6).

Would it make sense to have a configurable value used as the amount
subtracted from the 327.50 mate score? This way I could set it to 1.00
(or match it with my threshold setting) so that shorter mates will be
annotated along with all the other moves meeting the threshold setting.

That was sort of hard to put into words, so if I've been unclear on what
I mean here, please let me know.

Thanks,

-Matt

On Thu, 2010-11-18 at 01:33 +0100, Joost 't Hart wrote:
> Ok guys,
> 
> I am done. Give it a go!
> 
> And please report anything you do not like.
> 
> Cheers,
> Joost.
> 
> On 10/25/2010 09:17 PM, Matthew Twomey wrote:
> > Greetings all,
> >
> >       A. I am a beginning/intermediate player and I've started using SCID
> >          to track my games. I like to use the blunder check capability
> >          but I'm a little confused about how it works. One thing I want
> >          it to check for is missed opportunities for mate. I've been
> >          working with one particular game where there is a mate in three
> >          opportunity on move 34, which I missed. I'd like the blunder
> >          check to point this out, but it doesn't. If I leave the engine
> >          running (infinite analysis) and click on the move just before
> >          34, it instantly finds it - but while annotating, it doesn't.
> >
> > Some details:
> >
> > 1. PGN attached - the mate in three I'm trying to catch starts on move
> > 34 with 34.Nxf6
> >
> > 2. I'm using Stockfish 191 as the engine (although I've tried a few
> > others with the same result)
> >
> > 3. Initially I was using 5 seconds per move as the annotate setting, but
> > I've also tried 60 seconds per move - which didn't help.
> >
> > I'm wondering if it has an issue dealing with the relative "score" of
> > mate versus some high numeric value or something? Thoughts anyone or any
> > idea why this isn't working or what I might be doing wrong?
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > -Matt
> >
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Beautiful is writing same markup. Internet Explorer 9 supports
> standards for HTML5, CSS3, SVG 1.1,  ECMAScript5, and DOM L2 & L3.
> Spend less time writing and  rewriting code and more time creating great
> experiences on the web. Be a part of the beta today
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/msIE9-sfdev2dev
> _______________________________________________
> Scid-users mailing list
> Scid-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/scid-users



------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Beautiful is writing same markup. Internet Explorer 9 supports
standards for HTML5, CSS3, SVG 1.1,  ECMAScript5, and DOM L2 & L3.
Spend less time writing and  rewriting code and more time creating great
experiences on the web. Be a part of the beta today
http://p.sf.net/sfu/msIE9-sfdev2dev
_______________________________________________
Scid-users mailing list
Scid-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/scid-users

Reply via email to