Alexander Wagner, piątek, 17 kwietnia 2009: >> In fact, I wonder if those are ever used properly or is it >> used like both zugzwang symbols - there is only one symbol >> and random NAG from 3*2 possible is used by annotators. >At least those Informant games I have and checked use the >NAGs in numeric values as they should be used and seem to >distinguish them on the numeric level, that is including the >several stages and colours. In a way I do not really like >the idea of dropping this information in a symbolic >description by flattening it out and use the same symbol all >the time. That's a good news. I have seen some symbols used randomly by Fritz, as you confirmed below, and I wonder if showing the difference isn't just misleading. But if there is a chance of having some games with proper use of these symbols, we should definitely keep the difference.
As we talk about NAGs, what about improving NAG shortcuts/editor? I mean that some NAGs should replace another instead of being added at the end. Obvious sets are: ! !? ?! !! ? ?? += =+ -/+ +/- +- -+ = ~ Entering one of these should replace previous one. -- Michal Rudolf ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Stay on top of everything new and different, both inside and around Java (TM) technology - register by April 22, and save $200 on the JavaOne (SM) conference, June 2-5, 2009, San Francisco. 300 plus technical and hands-on sessions. Register today. Use priority code J9JMT32. http://p.sf.net/sfu/p _______________________________________________ Scid-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/scid-users
