Pascal Georges wrote:
Hi!
>> Additionally, what do you think would be a good GUI solution
>> to enter these NAGs? At the moment I allow for some keyboard
>> entry of say □ just as [] and so on (I could give a
>> transcription of this) but I think some graphical
>> representation to select from is needed. However, they are
>> many...
>
> From my point of view, to allow the entry of NAGs with keyboard is not
> the best solution given that :
> - it will take the few remaining free shortcuts
No, no. Not as shortcut right from the main window. Surely
not that. I'd leave this at the current stage, ie only those
needed very frequently like ! !? and so on, ie. that what is
there already.
What I did just allows you to enter something like [] in the
comment editor's NAG line and it gets replaced by the proper
$8.
> - shortcuts handling is difficult in Scid due to focus
> handling and the different behavior in various OS.
Does not apply. We spoke of different things. Sorry.
> - this may lead to a declaration in standardShortcuts
> proc, and I don't think it is worth it. A more straight
> forward list (or several categorized lists) seems better.
I've a more GUI oriented way in mind myself. I just found it
convenient to offer the more likely NAGs also to the
command line without the need to write UTF-chars I do not
have on my keyboard. ;)
--
Kind regards, / War is Peace.
| Freedom is Slavery.
Alexander Wagner | Ignorance is Strength.
|
| Theory : G. Orwell, "1984"
/ In practice: USA, since 2001
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by:
High Quality Requirements in a Collaborative Environment.
Download a free trial of Rational Requirements Composer Now!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/www-ibm-com
_______________________________________________
Scid-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/scid-users
