On 11/26/2015 08:20 PM, pwatt...@gmail.com wrote: > Sure. It allows for more natural language annotation. Something like: > > "The more direct 13.dxc5 dxc5 14.Qd3?! leaves the queen-side pawns much > more vulnerable." >
Okay, I got your point. From a developers point of perspective I am not much in favour to implement this feature. The comment editor would need sort of two text-input boxes and the notation must be somehow reorganized supporting visually comments that are meant to be "natural language". Scrolling through some chess books I can't even find a single example for your use case. So it seems to be quite common to annotate behind a move, at least in chess books. My impression is that, yes, you gain more flexibility. Being able to note down comments even in natural language would be nice. But that gain is not worth the effort to reorganize the comment editor, the notation window and adding more complexity to the backend. Though I would be interested to see how other chess software integrates this feature. Jens ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Go from Idea to Many App Stores Faster with Intel(R) XDK Give your users amazing mobile app experiences with Intel(R) XDK. Use one codebase in this all-in-one HTML5 development environment. Design, debug & build mobile apps & 2D/3D high-impact games for multiple OSs. http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=254741551&iu=/4140 _______________________________________________ Scid-users mailing list Scid-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/scid-users
