Thank you for your comments, Gregor.
When you say that
> support of Chess960 is possible, but a more suitable database format would
> be
> desirable for this.
>
you're restating the fact that to implement 360 properly, the SCID format
would need to be revised.
I'll revise the "require" (it was not intented as a logical impossibility)
or I'll add "in an optimal way."
I think we can agree that for someone who's looking to play or study 360,
SCID as we currently know it is not the tool.
***
I think the other comments were made by Fulvio, so I'll let him respond to
them.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Site24x7 APM Insight: Get Deep Visibility into Application Performance
APM + Mobile APM + RUM: Monitor 3 App instances at just $35/Month
Monitor end-to-end web transactions and take corrective actions now
Troubleshoot faster and improve end-user experience. Signup Now!
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=267308311&iu=/4140
_______________________________________________
Scid-users mailing list
Scid-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/scid-users
