> I cannot say yes or no to this.
I think you did, with the ".si4 cannot be used for Chess960," since SCID as
we currently know it uses .si4.
(I've corrected "Chess360" to "Chess960.")
***
I have the impression you don't want to commit to my claim because you'd
like a new format to be developed.
That is, "SCID as we currently know it" could comprise a new format - .si5.
Am I correct?
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Site24x7 APM Insight: Get Deep Visibility into Application Performance
APM + Mobile APM + RUM: Monitor 3 App instances at just $35/Month
Monitor end-to-end web transactions and take corrective actions now
Troubleshoot faster and improve end-user experience. Signup Now!
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=267308311&iu=/4140
_______________________________________________
Scid-users mailing list
Scid-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/scid-users
