On Tue, Apr 5, 2016 at 9:01 AM, Dave Howorth <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 2016-04-05 16:40, Alan Bartlett wrote: > >> On 5 April 2016 at 15:57, Yasha Karant <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> I know from past experience that ElRepo persons do read and reply to this >>> list. Does any EPEL person? If not, does anyone know how to contact the >>> EPEL maintainers? >>> >>> There is an issue with the EPEL MATE install method. >>> >>> Yasha Karant >>> >> >> Let me correct your above two blunders: >> >> (1) The ELRepo Project is not EPEL. >> (2) I, my fellow founders and administrators of the ELRepo Project do >> read this mailing list and do respond, when appropriate. >> > > I don't understand why you accuse Yasha of two blunders? > > His original post makes it clear that he understands the difference > between ElRepo and EPEL, so why do you think that is a blunder? > > He says that ElRepo DO read the list, which you then confirm, so why is > that a blunder? > > I think you owe him an apology, unless I have seriously misunderstood > something. > OK ... I see that there was some misunderstanding ... Let's make peace here, shall we? Regarding contacting EPEL maintainers, I see the following description in EPEL's FAQ: "You can find help or discuss issues on the epel-devel mailing list or IRC channel #epel on Freenode. Report issues against EPEL via bugzilla" ( https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL/FAQ#Where_can_I_find_help_or_report_issues.3F ) Just checked the epel-devel mailing list. It does not seem to be actively used at this moment. So, I would suggest use of bugzilla.redhat.com is the way to go. Regarding ELRepo, while we (ELRepo team members) are reading this SL list, it is best to use ELRepo's mailing list to address any issue or ask questions ( http://lists.elrepo.org/mailman/listinfo/elrepo ) rather than here. In fact, I encourage everyone who uses ELRepo's packages to subscribe to the list. Akemi
