The point is we don't. Still what's done is done. And now I'm hoping this means that we will be seeing a bigger role for Rhodey in IM3. Especially since he's playing a bigger role in the current comic (and has played a big role in the comic's past).
-GTw In a message dated 11/4/08 10:35:27 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > But *how* do they know that Howard couldn't handle the role? They never > gave him a chance. I love Cheadle's work, top to bottom, but he's a dramatic > actor. I can't see him fitting into what is primarily an action movie. > > > > > > ---------[ Received Mail Content ]---------- Subject : Re: [scifinoir2] Re: Ironman: Why They Say Terrance Howard was Fired Date : Tue, 4 Nov 2008 03:47:45 EST >From : [EMAIL PROTECTED] To : scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com I don't know. But I think he can do it. Especially after seeing him in that movie were he plays a CIA counter-agent. Still after reading the article does this mean that Rhodes will have a bigger role in the film now that they fell they have an actor that can handle it. Or will we barely see him in IM2 no matter who plays him because of this. -GTW > > ************** Plan your next getaway with AOL Travel. Check out Today's Hot 5 Travel Deals! (http://pr.atwola.com/promoclk/100000075x1212416248x1200771803/aol?redir=http://travel.aol.com/discount-travel?ncid=emlcntustrav00000001)
