Well, they discussed that, and I think one man's unwatchable is another man's high camp. Like I said, I think George reviewed "Catwoman" when he was in Britain, and thought it was camp fun. I found it to be some of the worst trash ever put on celluloid. Let me check the list again, 'cause I could swear "Catwoman" was on it.
----- Original Message ----- From: "Kelwyn" <ravena...@yahoo.com> To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com Sent: Friday, September 25, 2009 11:05:53 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern Subject: [scifinoir2] Re: Rotten Tomatoes Picks Worst Movies of the Last Decade Did I miss something? I don't see "Catwoman" on this list. "Catwoman" clocked a mighty 10% fresh rating and this list starts with "Whiteout" (number 100) with a 7% fresh rating. It is all down hill from there. While this list is strictly based on the fresh rating these films accrued (or failed to), there should be a distinction between something like "Basic Instinct 2" which is high gloss trash(like "Showgirls") but watchable and "Glitter" which is utterly unwatchable. ~(no)rave! --- In scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com , Keith Johnson <keithbjohn...@...> wrote: > > > > Not at all surprised to see "Catwoman" on tis list, despite some of you who > inexplicably thought it was some kind of sly tongue-in-cheek > masterpiece.(George, didn't you send a favorable review of it from England? > ) Also not surprised to see "Battlefield Earth" on there. I tried to watch > that one rainy Sunday morning when I didn't want to go anywhere--and turned > the channel after ten minutes. Never saw this "Ballistic: Ecks vs. Sever" > flick. The trailers were so bad I avoided it. Same for Eddie Murphy's > "Adventures of Pluto Nash", "Norbit", and anything with "Big Mamma" in the > title. > > > > Thoughts? Anything on here undeservedly, to your mind? Anything not on here > that should be? > > > > ***************************** > > http://www.rottentomatoes.com/guides/worst_of_the_worst/ > > > Intro | How It Works > Over the last decade, we've collected reviews for thousands of movies. Most > films, even profoundly mediocre ones, can expect to receive at least cursory > support from the pundits. However, once in a while, a film will take such a > critical drubbing that further attention is warranted. That's where our Worst > of the Worst list comes in. We've compiled a veritable cornucopia of dull, > foolhardy, and outright terrible films, from legendary duds ( Battlefield > Earth ) to chuckle-deficient comedies ( Epic Movie ), from hapless sequels ( > Basic Instinct 2 ) to scare-free would-be fright fests ( Alone in the Dark ). > We've pored over the reviews to bring you the lowest Tomatometers of the > decade -- including several ( All About Steve , Whiteout ) that were released > within the last several weeks. In other words, we suffered for our work -- > now it's your turn. > > > • Each critic from our discrete list gets one vote, all weighted equally. > • Reviews without ratings are not counted toward the results. > • Because reviews are continually added, manually and otherwise, we have a > cutoff date at which new reviews are not counted. The current cut off date is > 9/21/2009. > • The movies contained in this list are from 2000 to 2009. > • We rank the movies by Tomatometer. in the event of a tie score, the film > with more reviews is ranked more highly. >
