Bad Boys 2 is just pure excess and can at least be appreciated for the sheer level of bayhem *heh* on the screen. Ballistic is just horrible. Watching it will make you yearn for Bay's migraine inducing, quick cutting action porn.
-- In scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com, Keith Johnson <keithbjohn...@...> wrote: > > Wow, really was that bad, huh? > Can you give me a quick indication of why? I mean, i find it hard to imagine > how something could be so much worse than "Bad Boys 2"... > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Martin Baxter" <truthseeker...@...> > To: "SciFiNoir2" <scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com> > Sent: Friday, September 25, 2009 4:33:46 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern > Subject: RE: [scifinoir2] Rotten Tomatoes Picks Worst Movies of the Last > Decade > > > > > > > Oh, and Keith -- you spared yourself much pain by missing "Ballistic: Ecks vs > Sever". When I finally saw it (letting it filter all the way down to cable), > the only things I wanted to sever were my optic nerves. > > "If all the world's a stage and all the people merely players, who in bloody > hell hired the director?" -- Charles L Grant > > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fQUxw9aUVik > > > > > > To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com > From: keithbjohn...@... > Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 16:01:36 +0000 > Subject: [scifinoir2] Rotten Tomatoes Picks Worst Movies of the Last Decade > > > > > > > Not at all surprised to see "Catwoman" on tis list, despite some of you who > inexplicably thought it was some kind of sly tongue-in-cheek > masterpiece.(George, didn't you send a favorable review of it from England? ) > Also not surprised to see "Battlefield Earth" on there. I tried to watch that > one rainy Sunday morning when I didn't want to go anywhere--and turned the > channel after ten minutes. Never saw this "Ballistic: Ecks vs. Sever" flick. > The trailers were so bad I avoided it. Same for Eddie Murphy's "Adventures of > Pluto Nash", "Norbit", and anything with "Big Mamma" in the title. > > Thoughts? Anything on here undeservedly, to your mind? Anything not on here > that should be? > > ***************************** > http://www.rottentomatoes.com/guides/worst_of_the_worst/ > > Intro | How It Works > > Over the last decade, we've collected reviews for thousands of movies. Most > films, even profoundly mediocre ones, can expect to receive at least cursory > support from the pundits. However, once in a while, a film will take such a > critical drubbing that further attention is warranted. That's where our Worst > of the Worst list comes in. We've compiled a veritable cornucopia of dull, > foolhardy, and outright terrible films, from legendary duds ( Battlefield > Earth ) to chuckle-deficient comedies ( Epic Movie ), from hapless sequels ( > Basic Instinct 2 ) to scare-free would-be fright fests ( Alone in the Dark ). > We've pored over the reviews to bring you the lowest Tomatometers of the > decade -- including several ( All About Steve , Whiteout ) that were released > within the last several weeks. In other words, we suffered for our work -- > now it's your turn. > > > ⢠Each critic from our discrete list gets one vote, all weighted > equally. > ⢠Reviews without ratings are not counted toward the results. > ⢠Because reviews are continually added, manually and otherwise, we > have a cutoff date at which new reviews are not counted. The current cut off > date is 9/21/2009. > ⢠The movies contained in this list are from 2000 to 2009. > ⢠We rank the movies by Tomatometer. in the event of a tie score, the > film with more reviews is ranked more highly. > > > > > > Microsoft brings you a new way to search the web. Try Bing⢠now >