More importantly, the process of building Windows binaries should not need make, or anything else outside of what `python setup.py` can do.
My 2c, Vlad On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 7:59 AM, Gael Varoquaux <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 07:49:23AM +0100, Brian Holt wrote: >> Are you sure? We already use make in scikit-learn... > > But it's purely optional. > > I am completely OK with such an optional use, as long as it does not > become necessary to have make installed to work reliably with the scikit. > > Cheers, > > Gael > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Don't let slow site performance ruin your business. Deploy New Relic APM > Deploy New Relic app performance management and know exactly > what is happening inside your Ruby, Python, PHP, Java, and .NET app > Try New Relic at no cost today and get our sweet Data Nerd shirt too! > http://p.sf.net/sfu/newrelic-dev2dev > _______________________________________________ > Scikit-learn-general mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/scikit-learn-general ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Don't let slow site performance ruin your business. Deploy New Relic APM Deploy New Relic app performance management and know exactly what is happening inside your Ruby, Python, PHP, Java, and .NET app Try New Relic at no cost today and get our sweet Data Nerd shirt too! http://p.sf.net/sfu/newrelic-dev2dev _______________________________________________ Scikit-learn-general mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/scikit-learn-general
