On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 05:05:05PM +0200, Lars Buitinck wrote: > > I am completely OK with such an optional use, as long as it does not > > become necessary to have make installed to work reliably with the scikit.
> That's exactly what I was trying to suggest. We already use make for > optional developer convenience only, so why not hack extra convenience > into the Makefile? Not a problem with me, but I don't see the benefit as in my opinion, it should _not_ be run: I don't want to see the repo being flooded with changes in Cython-generated files that are due to people running make with different Cython versions. G ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Don't let slow site performance ruin your business. Deploy New Relic APM Deploy New Relic app performance management and know exactly what is happening inside your Ruby, Python, PHP, Java, and .NET app Try New Relic at no cost today and get our sweet Data Nerd shirt too! http://p.sf.net/sfu/newrelic-dev2dev _______________________________________________ Scikit-learn-general mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/scikit-learn-general
