2013/1/5 <[email protected]>: > in general +1 but actually I'd like to release pretty soon. > > > > Jake Vanderplas <[email protected]> schrieb: >> >> Hi All, >> Just a quick heads-up: thanks to some good work by Pauli Virtanen, SciPy >> is currently in the process of moving to a single code-base which >> supports 2.x and 3.x, and it doesn't look extremely difficult. It makes >> use of the `six` compatibility module, which is lightweight enough to be >> bundled with the Scipy source (see >> https://github.com/scipy/scipy/pull/397) >> >> I think that this would be a reasonable thing to try to accomplish for >> the next scikit-learn release. Taking the lead with SciPy on Python 2/3 >> compatibility could have a very positive ripple effect through the >> python/ML community. Any thoughts?
This is exactly what I was working on my py3k branch last year during the PyCon 2012 sprints in santa clara. All the tests were passing except for the included joblib that had diverged at that time. joblib in master is now fixed and now works both with 2.6+ and 3.2+. My branch is now very old, so it's probably worth to start again from scratch but might be helpful to get some inspiration on some tricky details: https://github.com/ogrisel/scikit-learn/tree/py3k -- Olivier http://twitter.com/ogrisel - http://github.com/ogrisel ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Master Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL, ASP.NET, C# 2012, HTML5, CSS, MVC, Windows 8 Apps, JavaScript and much more. Keep your skills current with LearnDevNow - 3,200 step-by-step video tutorials by Microsoft MVPs and experts. ON SALE this month only -- learn more at: http://p.sf.net/sfu/learnmore_123012 _______________________________________________ Scikit-learn-general mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/scikit-learn-general
