2013/1/6 Robert Layton <[email protected]>:
> On 6 January 2013 23:36, Andreas Mueller <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
> Any ideas what would actually be broken if we drop 2.6?
> New style prints have been backported to 2.6
> (http://docs.python.org/2/whatsnew/2.6.html#pep-3105-print-as-a-function),
> but there may be some numpy/scipy feature we use that isn't compatible.

I don't think it's that hard to have a single codebase that works both
on 2.6+ and 3.2+ (or 3.3+ directly).

Personally I'd like to keep 2.6 compat for at least an additional year
or so if it's not causing specific troubles to do so.

--
Olivier
http://twitter.com/ogrisel - http://github.com/ogrisel

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Master Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL, ASP.NET, C# 2012, HTML5, CSS,
MVC, Windows 8 Apps, JavaScript and much more. Keep your skills current
with LearnDevNow - 3,200 step-by-step video tutorials by Microsoft
MVPs and experts. ON SALE this month only -- learn more at:
http://p.sf.net/sfu/learnmore_123012
_______________________________________________
Scikit-learn-general mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/scikit-learn-general

Reply via email to