On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 9:55 PM, Bertrand Thirion <bertrand.thir...@inria.fr> wrote:
> It is true that singling out INRIA gives a distorted view on the set of > scikit contributors. > But it is also true that -as explained by Nelle- INRIA has been paying people > to work on the project only for more than three years now. We just need to > find a way to acknowledge this, especially if we want to have stronger > support in the future. I agree that Robert's slide doesn't reflect well the current state of the project. I think it would be fair to say that scikit-learn was 1) started as a GSOC by David Cournapeau 2) revived, redesigned and popularized by a core of INRIA researchers and 3) is now a community-driven project [*] (with occasional funding from INRIA, Google and others). It would be nice to clarify if INRIA is still paying an engineer for the project and if so whether he's full-time or has other duties. Mathieu [*] Out of the top 10 contributors, only 3 are or were affiliated with INRIA (https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/contributors) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Everyone hates slow websites. So do we. Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics Download AppDynamics Lite for free today: http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_d2d_mar _______________________________________________ Scikit-learn-general mailing list Scikit-learn-general@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/scikit-learn-general
