On 12 January 2017 at 08:51, Gael Varoquaux <gael.varoqu...@normalesup.org> wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 08:41:51AM +1100, Joel Nothman wrote: > > When the two versions deprecation policy was instituted, releases were > much > > more frequent... Is that enough of an excuse? > > I'd rather say that we can here decide that we are giving a longer grace > period. > > I think that slow deprecations are a good things (see titus's blog post > here: http://ivory.idyll.org/blog/2017-pof-software-archivability.html ) > Given that 0.18 was a very slow release, and the work for removing deprecated material from 0.19 has already been done, I don't think we should revert that. I agree that we can delay the deprecation deadline for 0.20 and 0.21. In terms of release schedule, are we aiming for RC in early-mid March, assuming Andy's above prognostications are correct and he is able to review in a bigger way in a week or so? J
_______________________________________________ scikit-learn mailing list scikit-learn@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/scikit-learn
