Hi, Are we still planning on an early April release for v0.19? Could we start marking "blockers"?
On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 5:31 PM, Andreas Mueller <t3k...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On 02/07/2017 09:00 PM, Joel Nothman wrote: > > On 12 January 2017 at 08:51, Gael Varoquaux <gael.varoqu...@normalesup.org > > wrote: > >> On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 08:41:51AM +1100, Joel Nothman wrote: >> > When the two versions deprecation policy was instituted, releases were >> much >> > more frequent... Is that enough of an excuse? >> >> I'd rather say that we can here decide that we are giving a longer grace >> period. >> >> I think that slow deprecations are a good things (see titus's blog post >> here: http://ivory.idyll.org/blog/2017-pof-software-archivability.html ) >> > > Given that 0.18 was a very slow release, and the work for removing > deprecated material from 0.19 has already been done, I don't think we > should revert that. I agree that we can delay the deprecation deadline for > 0.20 and 0.21. > > In terms of release schedule, are we aiming for RC in early-mid March, > assuming Andy's above prognostications are correct and he is able to review > in a bigger way in a week or so? > > Sometimes I wonder how Amazon ever gave me a job in forecasting.... > Spring break is March 13-17th ;) > > _______________________________________________ > scikit-learn mailing list > scikit-learn@python.org > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/scikit-learn > > -- Raghav RV https://github.com/raghavrv
_______________________________________________ scikit-learn mailing list scikit-learn@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/scikit-learn