How many current deprecations are expected in the next release? Andrew
On Jan 12, 2017 00:53, "Gael Varoquaux" <gael.varoqu...@normalesup.org> wrote: On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 08:41:51AM +1100, Joel Nothman wrote: > When the two versions deprecation policy was instituted, releases were much > more frequent... Is that enough of an excuse? I'd rather say that we can here decide that we are giving a longer grace period. I think that slow deprecations are a good things (see titus's blog post here: http://ivory.idyll.org/blog/2017-pof-software-archivability.html ) G > On 12 January 2017 at 03:43, Andreas Mueller <t3k...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 01/09/2017 10:15 AM, Gael Varoquaux wrote: > instead of setting up a roadmap I would rather just identify bugs > that > are blockers and fix only those and don't wait for any feature > before > cutting 0.19.X. > I agree with the sentiment, but this would mess with our deprecation cycle. > If we release now, and then release again soonish, that means people have > less calendar time > to react to deprecations. > We could either accept this or change all deprecations and bump the removal > by a version? > _______________________________________________ > scikit-learn mailing list > scikit-learn@python.org > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/scikit-learn > _______________________________________________ > scikit-learn mailing list > scikit-learn@python.org > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/scikit-learn -- Gael Varoquaux Researcher, INRIA Parietal NeuroSpin/CEA Saclay , Bat 145, 91191 Gif-sur-Yvette France Phone: ++ 33-1-69-08-79-68 http://gael-varoquaux.info http://twitter.com/GaelVaroquaux _______________________________________________ scikit-learn mailing list scikit-learn@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/scikit-learn
_______________________________________________ scikit-learn mailing list scikit-learn@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/scikit-learn
